Documentation Evolution: From Overload to AI-Ready

The three stages of documentation maturity and why leadership often misunderstands documentation as infrastructure.

Event Context

Session: Craft Across: Documentation in Design Systems
Date: August 7, 2025
Key Contributors: Dustin Younse (Indeed), Misty Reed (Robert Half)

This highlight emerged from a discussion about how design system documentation matures over time and why many organizations struggle with documentation strategy.

Core Insight

"The heart of a design system is the documentation, because the documentation is the agreement about how you do a thing" - Dustin Younse

Design system documentation evolves through three distinct stages of maturity, each requiring different approaches and success metrics.

The Three Stages of Documentation Evolution

Stage 1: Documentation Overload

The "More is Better" Trap

Teams create comprehensive documentation thinking volume equals value. Every component gets extensive write-ups, multiple examples, and detailed specifications. The result? Information overload where critical details get buried in noise.

Key Indicators:

  • Documentation takes longer to search than to implement
  • Teams create their own "cheat sheets" to bypass official docs
  • New team members feel overwhelmed rather than empowered

Stage 2: Concise "Cheat Code" Approach

Prioritized, Essential Information

Teams realize less can be more effective. Documentation becomes focused on essential information and quick reference. The shift moves from comprehensive coverage to prioritized, actionable content.

Key Indicators:

  • Documentation answers "how" quickly, not just "what"
  • Teams actually use the official docs instead of creating workarounds
  • New features get documented with clear, focused guidance

Stage 3: AI-Enabled Conversational Documentation

"Talk to Your Design System"

The future stage where documentation becomes conversational. Instead of searching through pages, teams ask questions and get contextual answers using MCPs (Model Context Protocols).

Key Indicators:

  • Teams ask questions instead of browsing documentation
  • Answers include citations to official guidelines
  • Documentation stays current through automated updates

Why This Framework Matters

  • Clear progression path - Know where you are and where you're going
  • Expectation management - Leadership understands documentation as ongoing infrastructure
  • Strategic planning - Each stage requires different approaches and investments
  • Success measurement - Different metrics matter at different stages

Key Speaker Insights

Dustin Younse (Indeed): "The heart of a design system is the documentation, because the documentation is the agreement about how you do a thing. Everything else is just kind of a secondary artifact."

Misty Reed (Robert Half): "I don't think everyone really thinks about that. The progression of growth. They're like, oh, we're going to build it. And we're done. And it's like, no, that's not how it is."

When to Apply This Framework

  • Teams wondering why documentation isn't being used
  • Leadership expecting documentation to be a one-time deliverable
  • Organizations struggling to measure documentation success
  • Teams building AI integration into their workflows

Quick Stage Assessment

Stage 1 Team: Creates 50-page component documentation → Team creates 2-page cheat sheet

Stage 2 Team: Creates 5-page focused guide → Team uses official docs daily

Stage 3 Team: Creates structured knowledge base → Team asks "How should I implement this?" and gets instant, contextual answers


Takeaway: Documentation isn't a checkbox to complete—it's infrastructure that evolves with your design system. Understanding which stage you're in determines your strategy, timeline, and success metrics.

Source: Craft Across: Documentation in Design Systems • August 7, 2025

Documentation Evolution: From Overload to AI-Ready - Infa